Digital Ethics

Digital Ethics

4075 bookmarks
Custom sorting
BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B
BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B
Llama 2-Chat is a collection of large language models that Meta developed and released to the public. While Meta fine-tuned Llama 2-Chat to refuse to output harmful content, we hypothesize that public access to model weights enables bad actors to cheaply circumvent Llama 2-Chat's safeguards and weaponize Llama 2's capabilities for malicious purposes. We demonstrate that it is possible to effectively undo the safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B with less than $200, while retaining its general capabilities. Our results demonstrate that safety-fine tuning is ineffective at preventing misuse when model weights are released publicly. Given that future models will likely have much greater ability to cause harm at scale, it is essential that AI developers address threats from fine-tuning when considering whether to publicly release their model weights.
·arxiv.org·
BadLlama: cheaply removing safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B
Research Paper | The New Developer
Research Paper | The New Developer
Based on the latest research from the Developer Success Lab, this white paper shares a human-centered, evidence-based framework to help developers thrive during this transition to AI-Assisted coding.
·pluralsight.com·
Research Paper | The New Developer
Abhishek on Twitter / X
Abhishek on Twitter / X
🚨 There is an urgent need for a legal and regulatory framework to deal with deepfake in India.You might have seen this viral video of actress Rashmika Mandanna on Instagram. But wait, this is a deepfake video of Zara Patel.This thread contains the actual video. (1/3) pic.twitter.com/SidP1Xa4sT— Abhishek (@AbhishekSay) November 5, 2023
·twitter.com·
Abhishek on Twitter / X
OpenAI announces leadership transition
OpenAI announces leadership transition
Chief technology officer Mira Murati appointed interim CEO to lead OpenAI; Sam Altman departs the company. Search process underway to identify permanent successor.
·openai.com·
OpenAI announces leadership transition
Underage Workers Are Training AI
Underage Workers Are Training AI
Companies that provide Big Tech with AI data-labeling services are inadvertently hiring young teens to work on their platforms, often exposing them to traumatic content.
·wired.co.uk·
Underage Workers Are Training AI
How a billionaire-backed network of AI advisers took over Washington
How a billionaire-backed network of AI advisers took over Washington
A sprawling network spread across Congress, federal agencies and think tanks is pushing policymakers to put AI apocalypse at the top of the agenda — potentially boxing out other worries and benefiting top AI companies with ties to the network.
·politico.com·
How a billionaire-backed network of AI advisers took over Washington
Debunking AGI inevitability claims
Debunking AGI inevitability claims
Have you heard these claims? “Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) is imminent!” or “At current rate of progress, AGI is inevitable!” In a recent preprint, my co-authors an…
·irisvanrooijcogsci.com·
Debunking AGI inevitability claims
Autonomous Vehicles, Artificial Intelligence, Risk and Colliding
Autonomous Vehicles, Artificial Intelligence, Risk and Colliding
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are often claimed to offer many societal benefits. Perhaps, the most important is the potential to save countless lives through anticipated improvements in safety by replacing human drivers with AI drivers. AVs will also dramatically...
·link.springer.com·
Autonomous Vehicles, Artificial Intelligence, Risk and Colliding
What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning
What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning
Recent vision-language (VL) models are powerful, but can they reliably distinguish "right" from "left"? We curate three new corpora to quantify model comprehension of such basic spatial relations. These tests isolate spatial reasoning more precisely than existing datasets like VQAv2, e.g., our What'sUp benchmark contains sets of photographs varying only the spatial relations of objects, keeping their identity fixed (see Figure 1: models must comprehend not only the usual case of a dog under a table, but also, the same dog on top of the same table). We evaluate 18 VL models, finding that all perform poorly, e.g., BLIP finetuned on VQAv2, which nears human parity on VQAv2, achieves 56% accuracy on our benchmarks vs. humans at 99%. We conclude by studying causes of this surprising behavior, finding: 1) that popular vision-language pretraining corpora like LAION-2B contain little reliable data for learning spatial relationships; and 2) that basic modeling interventions like up-weighting preposition-containing instances or fine-tuning on our corpora are not sufficient to address the challenges our benchmarks pose. We are hopeful that these corpora will facilitate further research, and we release our data and code at https://github.com/amitakamath/whatsup_vlms.
·arxiv.org·
What's "up" with vision-language models? Investigating their struggle with spatial reasoning